Brevo and MailerLite charge around different units and expose different limits. The better choice for a small newsletter depends on four inputs: active subscribers, messages per month, automation population and the labour required to run the programme safely.
Source date: Official pricing, billing, form and double-opt-in documentation was rechecked on 25 August 2026. No deliverability, inbox-placement or support test was performed.
Current free-plan shape
| Question | Brevo | MailerLite |
|---|---|---|
| Primary send limit | 300 email sends per day; unused sends do not roll over | 2,500 monthly emails |
| Published contact or subscriber limit | Up to 100,000 stored contacts | Up to 250 subscribers |
| Automation boundary | Up to 2,000 unique contacts can enter active automations on Free | Automations are included on Free; test the current feature boundary for the intended sequence |
| Branding | Brevo branding remains on Free | MailerLite logo remains on Free |
| Paid evaluation | Ongoing Free plan; paid tiers are organised by monthly sends and contact storage | 14-day feature trial advertised without a credit card, plus an ongoing Free plan |
These are not equivalent allowances. A large stored list does not mean Brevo can send one campaign to that entire list in a day. A small MailerLite subscriber ceiling can bind before its monthly email allowance does.
Decide from workload, not list size alone
| Scenario | Fit | Reason | Verify before deciding |
|---|---|---|---|
| 240 subscribers, one weekly issue, simple welcome email | strong | MailerLite's published Free subscriber and monthly-send limits can contain this example; Brevo can also fit if the daily cap is scheduled deliberately. | Add campaigns, welcome messages, resends and test sends before assuming the allowance is sufficient. |
| Several thousand stored contacts, occasional segmented sends | conditional | Brevo's send-volume model and large Free contact storage may align better than a subscriber-tier model. | Check the daily or monthly send tier, contact cap, segmentation need and tax at checkout. |
| Visual newsletter with landing pages and a compact audience | conditional | MailerLite bundles campaigns, forms, a website and landing page in its published Free route. | Confirm the present template, automation, branding and custom-domain boundaries. |
| Multi-channel lifecycle messaging and larger automation population | conditional | Brevo publishes email, SMS, WhatsApp and automation options, with important plan and add-on boundaries. | Price the required plan, channels, contacts entering automation, seats and message add-ons together. |
Brevo or MailerLite by newsletter operating scenario
- Scenario
- 240 subscribers, one weekly issue, simple welcome email
- Fit
- strong
- Reason
- MailerLite's published Free subscriber and monthly-send limits can contain this example; Brevo can also fit if the daily cap is scheduled deliberately.
- Verify before deciding
- Add campaigns, welcome messages, resends and test sends before assuming the allowance is sufficient.
- Scenario
- Several thousand stored contacts, occasional segmented sends
- Fit
- conditional
- Reason
- Brevo's send-volume model and large Free contact storage may align better than a subscriber-tier model.
- Verify before deciding
- Check the daily or monthly send tier, contact cap, segmentation need and tax at checkout.
- Scenario
- Visual newsletter with landing pages and a compact audience
- Fit
- conditional
- Reason
- MailerLite bundles campaigns, forms, a website and landing page in its published Free route.
- Verify before deciding
- Confirm the present template, automation, branding and custom-domain boundaries.
- Scenario
- Multi-channel lifecycle messaging and larger automation population
- Fit
- conditional
- Reason
- Brevo publishes email, SMS, WhatsApp and automation options, with important plan and add-on boundaries.
- Verify before deciding
- Price the required plan, channels, contacts entering automation, seats and message add-ons together.
Worked cost scenario
For 240 active subscribers and four newsletters per month, the campaign baseline is 960 sends. Add 240 welcome messages only if all subscribers are new that month, plus internal tests, transactional mail and any resend to non-openers. The workload can therefore range from roughly 1,000 sends in a steady month to more than 1,400 during acquisition.
MailerLite's 2,500 monthly Free allowance leaves room in this bounded example, while its 250-subscriber ceiling leaves almost none for growth. Brevo's 300-per-day cap can deliver a 240-person campaign in one day, but a 400-person issue would be split or require a paid plan. This arithmetic is a planning example, not a price quote or deliverability prediction.
For a paid comparison, capture the same invoice inputs for both tools: billing period, subscriber/contact tier, monthly send volume, seats, automation features, branding removal, landing pages, dedicated IP or other add-ons, tax and expected growth. Then add the operator's monthly hours for list hygiene, template changes, QA and reporting.
Consent and suppression are part of the product decision
Both platforms document form and double-opt-in workflows. Double opt-in is not a substitute for a lawful basis or clear notice, but it can create stronger evidence that an address owner confirmed the subscription. Record form version, consent wording, source, timestamp and confirmation state. Keep unsubscribed, bounced and complained addresses suppressed across imports and integrations.
Before switching providers, export active contacts and suppression states separately. Test whether unsubscribed people remain excluded after the migration. A cheaper plan is not cheaper if it creates manual consent repair or sender-reputation risk.
Migration acceptance test
Create a small seed list using addresses you control. Test signup, confirmation, welcome automation, campaign rendering, unsubscribe, suppression, export and deletion. Verify authentication records such as SPF, DKIM and DMARC through the provider's current setup instructions. Run the same script in both tools before choosing.
This comparison cannot establish inbox placement, conversion rate, support quality or the exact invoice for a reader's country. Those require account-level evidence and a representative sending history.




Reader discussion
Comments are public and require a GitHub account. By taking part, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.