How products are researched
Research begins with the reader's job, search intent and decision criteria. Editors prioritise official product documentation, help centres, terms, pricing pages and release information. Independent sources may be used for context, but material product claims should be traceable to primary evidence.
Hands-on experience is described only when dated notes, screenshots or test records exist. Research-only work is labelled accordingly.
How commissions work
UseAIVisora may earn a commission when a reader buys through an affiliate link. Disclosures appear near the beginning of relevant articles. Affiliate links use sponsored and nofollow attributes and are never disguised as normal site navigation.
How conclusions are reached
A review considers suitable users, unsuitable users, core tasks, ease of use, pricing context, important limitations and alternatives. A comparison applies the same criteria and fact-check date to each product.
Commercial relationships do not determine conclusions. The product paying the highest commission does not automatically win, rank first or receive more favourable wording.
Fact-checking
Prices, plan names, included features, limits, trial terms, refund statements and availability must be checked against an official source. The article records when facts were last checked. Unverified changing data stays out of the draft.
Corrections
Substantive errors should be corrected promptly and the updated date changed. A material correction should be noted in the article when it affects the reader's decision. Minor spelling or formatting fixes do not need a public correction note.
The owner must provide a monitored corrections address before launch. Messages should identify the article, disputed statement and supporting source.
Keeping information current
Commercial articles are reviewed based on risk and change frequency. Pricing and deals need more frequent checks than stable educational material. Outdated articles may be moved to review, given noindex status or archived until they are accurate again.
AI assistance
AI may assist with research organisation, outlines, editing or code, but it is not accepted as the source of a product fact. A human editor remains responsible for checking sources, removing unsupported claims and approving publication.